Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Formulation and In vitro/In vivo Evaluation of Sustained Release Diltiazem Matrix Tablets

Dheeraj Baviskar1 , Rajesh Sharma2, Dinesh Jain3

1Institute of Pharmaceutical Education, Boradi, Tal-Shirpur, Dist-Dhule; 2School of Pharmacy, D.A.V.V., Phashila Campus, Khandwa Road; 3College of Pharmacy, I.P.S. Academy, Rajendra Nagar, Indore, India.

For correspondence:-  Dheeraj Baviskar   Email: baviskar@sancharnet.in   Tel:+91 9850001942

Received: 18 July 2012        Accepted: 14 April 2013        Published: 12 June 2013

Citation: Baviskar D, Sharma R, Jain D. Formulation and In vitro/In vivo Evaluation of Sustained Release Diltiazem Matrix Tablets. Trop J Pharm Res 2013; 12(3):311-316 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v12i3.6

© 2013 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To develop and optimise sustained release (SR) matrix tablets of diltiazem hydrochloride (DHL).
Methods: DHL tablets were prepared by direct compression and consisted of hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC), Kollidon SR and Eudragit RSPO. A 32 full factorial design was applied to study the effect of polymers used on drug release from the DHL. The tablets were also evaluated for physicochemical characteristics and release kinetics.  In vivo (human) studies were carried out on the optimised formulation using a commercial sustained release product as a reference.
Results: The physicochemical characteristics of all prepared tablets were satisfactory. The developed drug delivery system provided prolonged drug release rates over a period of 24 h. The release profile of the developed formulation was described by the Higuchi model. Mean time to attain peak drug concentration (Tmax) was 2.05 ± 0.52  and 2.30 ± 0.57 h for the optimized and commercial formulations, respectively, while mean maximum drug concentration (Cmax) was 501.74 ± 0.05 ng/ml and 509.65±0.06, ng/ml, respectively. A fair correlation between the dissolution profile and bioavailability for the optimized formulation was observed based on linear regression analysis.
Conclusion: A fair correlation between in vitro dissolution and in vivo data was found for the optimized formulation of diltiazem. The results also indicate that the approach used could lead to a successful development of a sustained release formulation of the drug.

Keywords: Diltiazem, Matrix tablet, Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, Eudragit, Optimization

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates